What could happen if a regulated member does not satisfy the Board during a CPD review?

The correct choice highlights that if a regulated member does not satisfy the Board during a Continuing Professional Development (CPD) review, a review of their practice may be conducted. This process is part of a regulatory framework aimed at ensuring that professionals maintain the required competencies and adhere to the standards expected in their field.

The purpose of such a review is to evaluate the member's adherence to professional standards and identify areas where additional support or improvement may be needed. It serves as a proactive measure to ensure that members remain competent in their practice rather than immediately imposing penalties or sanctions. This approach promotes accountability while also providing an opportunity for the member to enhance their skills and knowledge.

Immediate suspension or revocation of membership tends to be reserved for more serious breaches of conduct. Financial penalties may also be applied in cases of non-compliance with professional regulations, but typically as a result of a formal disciplinary process rather than directly following a CPD review. Therefore, the response to unsatisfactory performance in a CPD review focuses on practice enhancement rather than punitive measures.