Which of the following interviews can the Practice Review Board conduct during an investigation?

The correct choice is based on the Practice Review Board's role in ensuring that regulated members adhere to professional standards and practices. By interviewing the regulated member and observing their work, the board can gather comprehensive and direct evidence of the member's performance and conduct in a professional setting. This dual approach allows for an assessment not only of the member’s self-reported experiences and qualifications but also of their practical implementation of skills and adherence to standards in real-time.

Observation of work combined with interviews provides a broader context for the member’s practices, enabling the board to evaluate their compliance with industry expectations and regulatory requirements effectively. Additionally, it creates an opportunity to engage in a dialogue about the member’s practices, receive feedback from the member in real-time, and identify areas for potential improvement or professional development.

In contrast, focusing solely on interviewing the regulated member may limit the understanding of their work due to the lack of observational evidence. Surveying clients and the member's employer, while informative about external perspectives, does not provide the insights gained from direct observation and interaction with the member in their work environment. Interviewing the regulated member’s family would typically be irrelevant to the scope of practice review, as it does not pertain to professional conduct or technical abilities related to their practice.